Samsung Galaxy S20 FE looks great — but the price is wrong
Samsung Milky way S20 FE looks great — just the toll is wrong
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is shaping up to be a rather impressive mid-range to semi-flagship telephone. It takes the Galaxy S20'due south 120Hz brandish, trio of rear cameras, and a powerful bit, makes a few compromises, and sells for $699 in the U.Due south. and £699 in the U.Thousand.
Samsung is marketing the telephone as a handset that takes the $.25 Samsung fans want and throws them in a more than affordable packet, leaving out a few features that some might find superfluous. But I don't actually get who the Galaxy S20 FE is for.
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Iron vs Milky way S20: What'due south different?
- How to pre-order Samsung Galaxy S20 Fe — the best deals right now
Why is it called Galaxy S20 FE?
Allow'southward kickoff with the fact that FE hither stands for "Fan Edition." If yous're a Samsung fan then surely you're going to desire to get a true flagship Galaxy telephone, whether it's the Galaxy S20 or you actually feel like splashing the cash on the Samsung Galaxy Notation 20 Ultra.
Flagship phones aren't cheap, but and so $699 isn't an insubstantial corporeality either. And fans of something tend to pay a fiddling more not-fans, so I think the name of the Milky way S20 Fe is a little off to brainstorm with. If it was called the Galaxy S20 Lite, as nosotros had thought, so I'd understand that.
Regular Galaxy S20 just as cheap on sale
Just why would you want a lite version of a flagship phone that was just released in March, when the Galaxy S20 is available for the same price or less?
In the U.S. you lot can get the regular Galaxy S20 right now for $659, and yous tin ofttimes observe it on auction for under $699.
Subsequently a quick Google search, I was able to find both the Galaxy S20 and Galaxy S20 Plus for under £600 in the U.Chiliad. A few of these models were only 4G capable, simply the 4G S20 FE is £599 so even so far from cheap.
Don't get me wrong: the S20 Fe isn't unfairly priced. Information technology's offering a lot for its price tag, only so too does the S20 now that it'south been out for some six months.
If I had to choose betwixt an older but more premium phone and a newer handset with a plastic build for a very like price, I'd accept the one-time each time. Samsung makes fantastic premium phones that are arguably worth paying more for. But when you can pay less some six months later and secure a phone that'll promise potent performance for at least two years, then yous're looking at a bargain. And i that I experience could render the S20 Atomic number 26 moot.
The good news is that Samsung'due south new phone already has some early discounts, with some Milky way S20 Atomic number 26 pre-club deals coming in at $599, but I'd argue that's still too steep.
Lost in the centre of the road
Putting aside the threat the Galaxy S20 FE faces from its older sibling, we're still looking at a mid-range telephone with an enviable spec list. Every bit mentioned, with a high refresh-charge per unit display and a photographic camera setup that looks similar information technology'll ape or potentially crush the photography on the S20 and S20 Plus, the S20 Atomic number 26 is an attractive prospect.
Samsung told me the S20 FE has been designed to bridge the gap between the flagship Southward-series phones and the mid to lower-stop A-serial handsets. That's a sound idea given not everyone has $1,000 to spend on a flagship phone or sign upwards to an expensive phone contract.
Simply I feel that $699 is the wrong price given the compromises the S20 FE comes with. While the inclusion of a Snapdragon 865 is great, I'm not sure there are masses of people who really discover the difference in operation between, say, a phone equipped with the latest Snapdragon 865 and the Snapdragon 720, which tin be establish in the $349/£349 Google Pixel 4a.
I've been using both the Snapdragon 865-sporting Oppo Detect X2 Pro (a £1,099 handset) and Pixel 4a. The Detect X2 Pro feels a chip snappier in daily use, but I've never felt the Pixel 4a slowed me down. And the actress performance of the Find X2 Pro doesn't scale with the £750 price difference.
The aforementioned can be said for phone photography. It'south at present so good that yous need to get looking for subtle differences in photos past bravado them upwards on an external display. Phones nether $500 non only accept photos that are fine for social media — speaking anecdotally, I don't know many people who get their smartphone snaps printed out — but some deliver very impressive performance, such as the $399 iPhone SE 2020.
$500 is the sweetness spot
Had Samsung priced the Galaxy S20 FE at around the $500 marking, and so I'd be very intrigued by the S20 FE. It would mean the S20 Atomic number 26 would end up butting heads with the Samsung Milky way A71, which launched with a cost of $599. But the price of the Galaxy A71 has already dropped, and so in that location's definitely scope for Samsung to come up with a $500 phone.
And the S20 Iron could indeed get downwardly to that price. When sales events like Black Fri come forth, Samsung phones and carrier contracts with them can be snapped upward at deal prices. If that does happen, I tin see myself recommending the S20 Fe to people who desire a phone that delivers strong performance, photography and features at a expert price.
As it stands, I remain a bit dislocated and nonplussed past the Galaxy S20 FE. And with the Pixel 5 and OnePlus 8T just effectually the corner, I suspect nosotros'll see more impressive phones that could undercut the S20 Iron at its current toll. October can't come hither shortly enough.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s20-fe-looks-great-but-who-it-is-for
Posted by: mcgriffholoo1954.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy S20 FE looks great — but the price is wrong"
Post a Comment